It was written by Cyrus Nowrasteh, who describes himself as “more of a libertarian than a strict conservative,” and is giving interviews to hard-right sites like Front Page Mag to promote the film.
Cyrus Nowrasteh producer of the film “The Path to 9/11” says:
This movie is well-supported and well-documented. But everyone should be aware, and we say so upfront in a long legend -- "The following dramatization...has composite and representative characters and incidents, and time compressions have been used for dramatic purposes."
The director of the film, David Cunningham, is already backtracking about its accuracy, saying “this is not a documentary.” OK, fair enough. But the movie is being billed as “based on the 9/11 Commission Report.”
How does it portray our Heroes of Democracy in the administration?
Salon has a review:Condoleezza Rice gets that fated memo about planes flying into buildings, and makes it very clear to anyone who’ll listen just how concerned President Bush is about these terrorist threats — despite the fact that we’re given little concrete evidence of the president’s concern or interest in taking action. Maybe my memory fails me, but the only person I remember talking about Osama bin Laden back in 1998 was President Clinton, while the current anti-terrorist stalwarts worked the country into a frenzy over what? Blow jobs. In the end, “The Path to 9/11″ feels like an excruciatingly long, winding and deceptive path, indeed.
The factual information around 9/11 re-mixed for dramatic effect. That is sick. But definitely not new. The mainstream media has been doing just that for years.
Get some real factual information about this atrocity at Mother Jones. They have created a must see timeline of lies. No composites, incidents or timelines manipulated for dramatic effect.
HERE: Mother Jones
The Raw Story