Tuesday

5,000 men murdered?

a letter abroad

man! looking back over the last 15 years or so of my life, there are so many things that i honestly never ever thought i would live to see. and i am 37. it makes my head spin- and after the last few weeks- i am sure many folks are having the same sensation. and i am sure, like me, they are wishing a few heads would roll. alas, i don't think i will live to see that (and no, i am not dying. i hope to live a long and productive life). being an american, i guess i am still at the point where i wonder what the hell is wrong with my fellow americans. and i can only imagine what foreign folks looking in must think. and i guess i would like them to know that not all of us allowed this to happen.

if i could reach the whole world, i would like them to know that there are those of us who are truly sorry for the state of affairs we all find ourselves in. apologizing seems so small compared to the great harm that america has inflicted on the rest of the globe. what i want the people of the world to know is that there are those of us who are not bible thumping, creationist believing, greedy, selfish, grasping, power hungry, self righteous, bigoted, misogynistic, homophobic nightmares with god complexes and a lust for empire. there are few of us compared to the 20 percenters who are hardlined and hardonned for bush/mccain- there are few of us compared to the 20 percent or so who follow the nancy pelosi philosophy of greed and appeasement. but we are out there. and we predicted what would happen and we continue to see how things are going- and for that i am sorry.

the few of us cannot change the will of the majority. that isn't how our government is set up. it was at one time- but not any longer. the best we can do is sow seeds of freedom and revolution and truth- and i fear that it will be up to the foreign folks to reign in our wayward corporatocracy. apparently, we, the people, have lost the will to fight.

Disaster Capitalism

Monday

Sunday

Social Justice Quiz 2008, continued

Authored by Bill Quigley, a human rights lawyer and law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. Previous questions are found on The Peace Tree: #1-7 on Sunday, September 14. #8-12 on Sunday, September 21.
Click below for the answers to (and documentation of) today's segment of the quiz.


13. How many people does our government say are homeless in the US on any given day?

14. What percentage of people in homeless shelters are children?

15. How many veterans are homeless on any given night?

16. The military budget of the United States in 2008 is the largest in the world at $623 billion per year. How much larger is the US military budget than that of China, the second largest in the world?

Expand the post +/-


13. 754,000 are homeless. About 338,000 homeless people are not in shelters (live on the streets, in cars, or in abandoned buildings) and 415,000 are in shelters on any given night.
2007 U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Annual Homeless Report to Congress, page iii and 23.
The population of San Francisco is about 739,000.

14. HUD reports nearly 1 in 4 people in homeless shelters are children 17 or younger.
Page iv – 2007 HUD Annual Homeless Report to Congress.

15. Over 100,000 veterans are homeless on any given night. About 18 percent of the adult homeless population is veterans.
Page 32, 2007 HUD Homeless Report.
This is about the same population as Green Bay. Wisconsin.

16. Ten times. China's military budget is $65 billion. The US military budget is nearly 10 times larger than the second leading military spender.
GlobalSecurity.org


Saturday

Saturday Sonata XV: 8 Bells

LT: 8 bells.

I suggest putting on headphones and playing these one at a time, in order.

I suggest putting on headphones and playing all of these at the same time.





Expand the post +/-














A letter to Mr.Bush from a Mom on Mainstreet....


Dear Mr.Bush,
I know you will never read this letter, and that you don't read much period. I don't care I am still going to write it, because I Vote and I pay Taxes. I am horrified at what you have done to this Country, OUR Country. I know you ran your two Drilling Businesses into the Ground, Arbusto and Harken, but you had your Daddy and his friends bail you out. So I guess "Bailing " is always viewed by you as a Solution. See I am a mom, a single mom and a nurse. I know you don't respect Single Moms, you have made that clear in your speeches and in your Laws. I work hard, but I don't make much and I do take care of my son and I have never asked Anyone for a Dime. Most Single Moms I know work really hard.....

And now we learn that these Huge Corporations and Banking Entities on Wall Street have made mistakes and mismanaged their Monies and Investments. And you sent Mr "Hank" Paulson to the Hill today to explain to Hurry Up and Sign paperwork basically giving him total Control over 700 Billion Dollars. Personally I have trouble with trusting Men with Sandbox Names ( ie, Scooter). He came to the Hearing today, and I realized he has only been Director of the Treasury for 22 Monthes. He must miss Goldman Sachs, and His 38 Million /year CEO job, and his role Running Board Meetings. But he treated our Senators like they were disgruntled employees he could badger, he was arrogant and short sighted. I know it is hard to live on 300 Million Dollars and have any Comprehension of Someone like me that lives below poverty level.

I watched him field Questions about WHY there was no Oversight Proposed, No Auditing, and no Regulatory observances.And in his 3 pages of The Plan, there are 32 WORDS that make Mr.Paulson a Czar of this massive amount of money. I am confused that he worked at Goldman Sachs just 22 monthes ago, he did not see ANY Problems on the Horizon , especially after the Bearn Stearns Failure ? And the Other 11 Banks that already Failed ? And there were NO other Warnings or Economists voicing Concerns, even after watching Commercial Properties Fail En Masse and 9000 Families Lose their Homes a day to Foreclosure.

And then I watched you go to the UN while The Bailout Hearings were going on and the Stock Market again was like watching a cat weave between rockers on a summer porch. It is a Labile Market driven by Nerves and Rumors at this point. So you, Our Failed President go to the UN, and there you attempt to strong arm our Elected Reps by laying the Whole Financial Drama before the UN. How Unpresidential of you to go there and Air Our Very Dirty Broken Laundry. I am surprised you did not go there and just hold our your hand and maybe even shed a few crocodile tears as part of your performance.

See Here is the Thing, YOU and YOUR administration are asking People like me,moms, and dads and families that are struggling to just put food on the table and take care of our kids and our folks. People are struggling, 47 Million Plus without Health Insurance, 50 Million Underinsured ( and facing Huge Medical Bills), and 27 Million living in Poverty, and 15 Million are children.These People that are already hurting and stretched too thin and eating noodles and turning off Utitlities and selling their belongings are supposed to Bailout the WallStreet CEO's ? So they can get their Multi Million Dollar Severance Packages and escape to the Cayman Islands ?

Mr.Bush we have already Experienced Under Your Failed Leadership An Illegal War and all the damages that brings, the Devastation of Katrina, Rita and IKE, and now you have Devastated our Financial System....and we learned tonight you and your Administration 6 monthes ago that there were problems, and you did NOTHING. And now you want Money from us, all of us and Our Children. That means you KNEW all summer that there Massive Trouble on the Horizon and you did Nothing. Like when you got the August 6th Memo in 2001 warning of Trouble and you did Nothing. I wonder, is there a Financial Memo that warned of this Wallstreet Disaster, I bet there were MANY.

Tonight we learn that there are FBI Investigations regarding Potential Fraud at Management Levels at Lehman Brothers, AIG, and Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. And yet the paperwork that Mr.Paulson brought forth had 32 words that would have prevented ANY Investigations, Criminal or otherwise. So we are supposed to give money to coverup these Possible Crimes and Bailout the Possible Perpetrators ?

These 32 WORDS would have prevented ANY Investigation:
"Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency."

Mr.Bush you know Nothing of Mainstreet and What is happening to Real People In this Country. You need to stop your Motorcade and look at the People and the Suffering that you have Inflicted on this country. This is not a Golf Game, there are NO Mulligans and No One to Bail Us, We The People.... Out. 8000 Families a day lose their Homes, they Know the Truth there is Something Wrong here In America and No One is Bailing them out.


**********************************
3 Articles to learn More:
(1) articale about the Bailout And WHY I think it is right. Asia Times

(2) 10 things you should know about the BIG Fleece and you will wish you didn't know later....

(3) The Great American Kleptocracy tells the whole story.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Dear Mr.President by PINK:

My Friends...

Friday

'Round Midnight...

Mohawk News repositions this weeks biggest "news" story beautifully...

“HOLD ON! INDIGENOUS PEOPLES!”. IT’S GONNA BE A ROUGH RIDE. THE INTERNATIONAL ROBBERY OF OUR TERRITORIES & RESOURCES CONTINUE FOR NOW!



Expand the post +/-



“HOLD ON! INDIGENOUS PEOPLES!”. IT’S GONNA BE A ROUGH RIDE. THE INTERNATIONAL ROBBERY OF OUR TERRITORIES & RESOURCES CONTINUE FOR NOW!

MNN. Sept. 25, 2008. Who would have thought that artificial economies and their worthless paper currencies, based on theft of Indigenous resources, would come tumbling down? Greed and oppression can’t go on forever. These foreigners have been wheeling and dealing with goods stolen from us. Remember, they came here with nothing! Every inch of Onowaregeh, Turtle Island, they stand on is unsurrendered Indigenous territory. We are the caretakers. We will never give it up.

These colonial money grubbers never treated us right. They killed, hurt and weakened us and then took advantage of us. It looks like payback time. Nature is getting even. The natural order has to be restored. The people have to face up to what they’ve done or allowed to be done. The rape and pillaging of our mother earth has to stop. She has to be cared for.

Yes, it looks like we Indigenous will have to hang onto our hats and ride out the storm. We are still the trustees of everything over, on and beneath the land. We still have our lives. We still have our families. We still have the future generations to look out for. These rapacious thieves did not take care of mother earth as we did. They plundered her for instant pleasure and then moved on without thinking of the future. The colonists think they have to “conquer” nature and its caretakers, us. What are they afraid of?

The European throngs swarmed to our territory for deceptive ends. The so-called “conquest” of the “New World” was a European concoction. These pirates embezzled the “ownership” our property and forced people into slavery to work for them for next to nothing. Onowaregeh was occupied and ruined by a class of white European men who set up an individualistic capitalist exploitation system. Even when they charged over here for the “gold rush”, they had no concept of leaving anything for the future generations, or even of sharing with anybody.

The few elite made products with our resources, sold it and set up banking and monetary systems that were backed by the gun. Their highest ideals were racism, individualism, greed, grabbing other people’s property and accumulating more wealth than they needed. The driving feature is that the white race is superior and could enslave and kill Indigenous people. The lower order “settlers” were infected as well. They have a similar mentality of exploitation and victimization. Anyone who came here could grab our land and make a homestead. Today settler society is divided between the “parasites” and those who worked for them.

Developers have been putting up our unceded territories as collateral on the stock exchanges to raise billions of dollars from the public. This is fraud. The U.S. economic system is based on stolen Indigenous goods, lands and resources to prop up its ailing dollar. Countries worldwide accepted the U.S. dollar as the international currency. Now they have to work together to keep this whole fake economic engine going. If they bring it down it will bring chaos to them.

Their economic fantasy is that they think they can endlessly put value in the circulatory process they’ve created. They steal everything, create nothing and sell it to each other. The U.S. and Canadian production bases have been totally eroded. The reality is that you can’t consume what you don’t produce. The colonial entities have to take what they need through force, like oil from the Middle East. The dollar has to be back with armed force to steal other people’s resources.

It’s all inter-connected. The corporations sell ‘air’ at inflated prices, paid for with worthless paper money based on “faith”. Wall Street is based on greed, investing money and watching markets here and there. The U.S. government looks desperate. They fear their delusional bubble will burst. The oligarchs have made an exit plan to run away with suitcases of money. When the Russian Czar’s regime went down in the early 1900s, people fled with cash that was later worthless. The Wall Street oligarchs have an army to cover their tracks.

Despite the propaganda, the people are going to be alright. It can always get worse. The deprivation can go to a deep dark end. We need to resist their dire threats of medieval retrogression to torture chambers, burnings, hanging, drawing and quartering and impaling. It doesn’t have to happen.

Now the U.S. government is going to take money from the taxpayers and give it to the bankers who caused the problems in the first place. When the people go to the bank to borrow money they will be told, “There’s no money. We had to give it to our banker friends.” The U.S. visible and invisible government is trying to control all the land and housing.

Instead of charging them with criminal acts of treason and conspiracy, the buy-out is going to the head gangsters. The drafter of the buy-out is U.S. Secretary of the Treasury, Henry Paulsen, who worked for Goldman and Sachs on Wall Street for 35 years. According to the package, once he gets the money, he is not accountable. He is beyond all courts and legislation. This is a reversion to the “divine right of kings”. They want total control over society, a “coup d’etat”.

The “wrecking ball” scenario is based on fear, intimidation and blackmail.
The 3rd Infantry Division of the 1st Brigade Combat Team is being brought back to the U.S. from Iraq in case there’s a public “fall out”. John McCain suspended his election campaign. Next the constitution will be suspended. The election could be pulled. There will be no discussion or debate. An immediate decision on the package is being forced to serve the needs of the oligarchic ruling elite.

The U.S. is the leading imperialist. Presently with outsourcing, unemployment, housing foreclosures and economic and social problems the base for consumption is getting narrow. The industrial base is shrinking. Its main production is military weapons, armaments and surveillance equipment. Scientific and technological research is aimed at creating more lethal weapons to kill innocent unarmed people.

The second seller is high end luxury goods to a narrow elite market. The basic necessities of the majority is neglected more and more. The economy is being hallowed out through impoverishment and ruination of people. Other states are still tied to the U.S. monster. They are making new arrangements to separate themselves from this world crisis.

The public is crying out for major change to end the colonial racist greedy system. They have to look at Indigenous culture and harmonize their society with ours to survive. They need to renew all their arrangements with us to live, think and govern themselves so that the parasites are pushed aside. Sacrifices are necessary or humanity will destroy itself.

There is another world, a world of resistance. Our fate rests in our own humble hands. Indigenous people have survived. We kept our philosophy, our notions of governance, our duties to mother earth and our way of life which was terribly damaged. We have been able to resuscitate it and bring it back to a healthy life. We all have our strengths. We have an enormous evolved consciousness. People are beginning to see through this capitalist fraud.

Do U.S. President George Bush, Republican candidate John McCain and Democratic candidate Barack Obama want to really re-arrange the economy and society on a new basis? Do they want to dig up the roots of the colonial past and harmonize relations with the Indigenous people and mother earth?

Throughout, the colonists and their banker backers thought they could just ride rough shod over us while they devastated the planet. We are still here because we always resisted.

Karakwine & MNN Staff, Mohawk Nation News www.mohawknationnews.com Katenies20@yahoo.com
Note: Current border challenges cost money. Your financial help is needed. Please send donations to PayPal at www.mohawknationnews.com, or by check or money order to “MNN Mohawk Nation News”, Box 991, Kahnawake [Quebec, Canada] J0L 1B0. Nia:wen thank you very much.

Posted by MNN Mohawk Nation News www.mohawknationnews.com
Go to MNN “Economics” category for more stories; New MNN Books Available now! Purchase t-shirts, mugs and more at our CafePressStore http://www.cafepress.com/mohawknews; Subscribe to MNN for breaking news updates http://.mohawknationnews.com/news/subscription.php; Sign Women Title Holders petition! http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/Iroquois

Naomi Klein has a take on the bail out...

Free market freak-out
If Bush can intervene to save corporations, why not Americans facing foreclosure?


Expand the post +/-



Free market freak-out
If Bush can intervene to save corporations, why not Americans facing foreclosure?

Whatever the events on Wall Street mean, nobody should believe the overblown claims that the current market crisis signals the death of “free market” ideology.

Free market ideology has always been a servant to the interests of capital, and its presence ebbs and flows depending on its usefulness to those interests.
Rest assured: the ideology will come roaring back when the bailouts are done. The massive debts the public is accumulating to bail out the speculators will then become the rationale for deep cuts to social programs, and for a renewed push to privatize what’s left of the public sector.
We will also be told that our hopes for a green future are, sadly, too costly.
What we don’t know is how the public will respond.
If the state can intervene to save corporations that took reckless risks in the housing markets, why can’t it intervene to prevent millions of Americans from imminent foreclosure?
By the same token, if $85 billion can be made instantly available to buy the insurance giant AIG, why is single-payer health care – which would protect Americans from the predatory practices of health-care insurance companies – seemingly such an unattainable dream?
Now that it’s clear that governments can indeed act in times of crisis, it will be much harder for them to plead powerlessness in the future.
Another potential shift has to do with market hopes for future privatizations.
For years, the global investment banks have been lobbying politicians for two new markets: one that would result from privatizing public pensions and the other from a new wave of privatized or partially privatized roads, bridges and water systems.
Both of these dreams have just become much harder to sell: Americans are in no mood to trust more of their individual and collective assets to the reckless gamblers on Wall Street.
With the World Trade Organization talks off the rails, this crisis could also be the catalyst for a radically alternative approach to regulating world markets and financial systems.
Already, we’re seeing a move toward “food sovereignty” in the developing world, rather than leaving access to food to the whims of commodity traders. The time may finally have come for ideas like taxing trading, which would slow speculative investment, as well as other global capital controls.
And now that nationalization is no longer a dirty word, the oil and gas companies should watch out: someone needs to pay for the shift to a greener future, and it makes most sense for the bulk of the funds to come from the highly profitable sector that is most responsible for our climate crisis. It certainly makes more sense than creating another dangerous bubble in carbon trading.
But the crisis we are seeing calls for even deeper changes than that. The reason these junk loans were allowed to proliferate was not just because the regulators didn’t understand the risk. It is because we have an economic system that measures our collective health by GDP growth alone. So long as the junk loans were fuelling economic growth, our governments actively supported them.
What is really being called into question by the crisis is the unquestioned commitment to growth at all costs. Where this crisis should lead us is to a radically different way for our societies to measure health and progress.
None of this, however, will happen without huge public pressure and the kind of direct action that ushered in the New Deal in the 1930s. Without it, there will be superficial changes and a return, as quickly as possible, to business as usual.
NOW | September 24-October 1, 2008 | VOL 28 NO 4

Gaffes, Games, and Gotchas

Thursday

jock doubleday

the revolution will not be organized- read all here

"You will not march in file.
You will not march.
The revolution will not be organized.

In your darkest hour,
beneath the burning moon,
you will pledge allegiance to the truth,
as those before you pledged allegiance to the truth.

The truth cannot be organized.
"

Million Doors For Peace Campaign

Last Saturday, September 20, I joined an effort called a Million Doors for Peace, a consolidated effort between several organizations working to end the Iraq war, including Code Pink, MoveOn and Veterans for Peace. What follows is a entry I posted to my blog about the experience. I've since added a few details that have occurred to me since the original post was written.

I went out canvassing the neighborhood on behalf of Million Doors for Peace today. There were forty registered voters on my list. Out of those, I got the signatures of thirteen people, plus signatures from seven additional people who were not on my list but were home at the time I knocked, for a total of twenty signatures. One person on my list refused to sign, while another not on my list but has replaced the voter in that residence, also refused to sign.

Let me tell you a little about my neighborhood. It's mostly working class to lower middle-class,lots of elderly people and a smattering of middle-aged voters with young adults living at home. And there is the housing project, where rent-subsidized apartments are occupied mostly by new immigrants, the disabled, single parents and their children. It is a hard project to move into because it is largely quiet, clean and trouble-free. Here is a photo of a section of that housing project:


This is where I found the least people at home and where a lot of people no longer lived at the address I was given by the MDFP campaign. There were several people with Russian names and a couple were Asian. I wondered if so many people not at home meant they were at work. There are so many working poor people in this community who work service jobs that include weekends. I wondered how many of these people had health care benefits. Sigh.

One of the two people who refused to sign stated about the troops coming home:

"They'll come home when they come home."

A few comments from people who supported a date for troop withdrawal:

This is from the neighbor on my street who is a relatively young retiree:

"I was against it from the start. And I'm a veteran." (his wife was holding an infant grandchild and nodded in agreement).

From a middle-aged woman who very enthusiastically took my clipboard:

"I'd be happy to sign your petition. I agree with you 100%." (she shook my hand)

A middle-aged man in the same building stated:

We should've gotten out years ago.

Most people didn't say anything but gladly signed. It was a beautiful day and I found many people not at home but I left a door hanger with information.

It was an interesting experience and one that made me feel like I was doing something. I expected that by now there would be results posted at the website but I've not seen anything nor received any email update. If you know any stats on results, please leave information in comments. I read somewhere that 500 people participated in this effort. A dismaying number, which made me feel discouraged.


Wednesday

Elections: A Tale Of Two Sides Of The 49th Parallel

Why opine on the elections in both the U.S. and Canada at the same time?

The reason is simple: the stakes are pretty much the same in both countries.

Or rather, the fundamental question underlying the general elections in Canada and the U.S. is essentially the same: will the people wise up and rid themselves of the same brand of far right republicans/conservatives?

(Fair warning: this post is a rather lenghty one!)


Expand the post +/-



As many Canadian progressives have pointed out in the last couple of years (yours truly included, bien sûr), today's brand of Canadian conservatism as displayed and promulgated by the CPC is pretty much the same as that of the U.S. Republican party (RNC or "G.O.P.", as it likes to call itself) - including neoconservatism, Christian Right "moral" values, self-proclaimed "toughness on crime", self-proclaimed "toughness on security", boastful (false) patriotism, et al.

And of course, the same talking points are used:
On the so-called self-serving, fearmongering motive behind the "threat" from "Islamofascists/terrorists"? (emphasis added)
"They hate what we see right here in this chamber - a democratically elected government. Their leaders are self-appointed. They hate our freedoms - our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 09/20/2001;

"The terrorists hate our country, they hate our freedom, they hate everything we stand for in the world." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 03/26/2004;

"I would think that the absolute gravest threat is the struggle that we're in against Islamic extremism, which can affect, if they prevail, our very existence." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 06/10/2008;

"And I do believe, though, that this war against extreme Islamic terrorists is the right thing. It’s an unfortunate thing, because war is hell and I hate war, and, today is the day that I send my first born, my son, my teenage son overseas with his Stryker brigade, 4,000 other wonderful American men and women, to fight for our country, for democracy, for our freedoms. Those are freedoms that too many of us just take for granted." - (G.O.P. candidate for Vice-President of the U.S.) Governor Sarah Palin, 09/11/2008;

"They hate open, diverse and democratic societies like ours because they want the exact opposite, a society that is closed, homogeneous and dogmatic." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 06/19/2006.
On "fighting them over there, so we don't have to fight them over here"? (emphasis adeed)
"We are fighting these terrorists with our military in Afghanistan and Iraq and beyond so we do not have to face them in the streets of our own cities." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 10/25/2004;

"We will confront and defeat the terrorists at the heart and center of their power so we do not have to face them on the streets of our own cities." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 03/26/2004;

"Failure in Afghanistan risks a reversion to its pre-9/11 role as a sanctuary for al Qaeda terrorists with global reach." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 02/10/2007;

"Defeating radical Islamist extremists is the national security challenge of our time. Iraq is this war's central front, according to our commander there, General David Petraeus, and according to our enemies, including al Qaeda's leadership." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, Nov./Dec./2007;

"In order to stop Islamic extremists, those terrorists who would seek to destroy America, and our allies, we must do whatever it takes, and we must not blink. In making those tough decisions of where we go, and even who we target. I believe that America has to exercise all options in order to stop the terrorists who are hell-bent on destroying America, and our allies. We have got to have all options out there on the table." - (G.O.P. candidate for Vice-President of the U.S.) Governor Sarah Palin, 09/11/2008;

"I don't have to tell you ... the risk that terrorism will come home if we don't confront it here (in Afghanistan)." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 06/19/2006.
On "staying the course"? (emphasis added)
"So we've got tough action in Iraq. But we will stay the course." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 04/05/2004;

"But ultimately what they (the terrorists)'re betting on is that we don't have the stomach for the fight, and we cannot afford to validate that strategy. We can win (in Iraq). We are winning, but we've got to stay at it." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 06/22/2006;

"We've got to stay the course (in Iraq)." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 10/24/2004;

"I hate war and I want to see war ended. We end war when we see victory, and we do see victory in sight in Iraq." - (G.O.P. candidate for Vice-President of the U.S.) Governor Sarah Palin, 09/11/2008;

"We honor those who take risks and make the ultimate sacrifice (in Afghanistan) by making a commitment to staying the course." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 05/17/2006.
On "cutting and running"? (emphasis added)
"We're not going to cut and run (from Iraq) if I'm in the Oval Office." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 04/21/2004;

"We're in this (Iraq) fight to win. These colors don't run." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 12/18/2005;

"I was heartened to hear the president say that we cannot cut and run in Iraq." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 11/05/2003;

"We can't cut and run." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 09/22/2005;

"Cutting and running (from Afghanistan) is not your way. It's not my way." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 03/13/2006.
On the "valididty" of the Iraq war, WMDs, regime change, et al.? (emphasis added)
"The threat comes from Iraq. It arises directly from the Iraqi regime's own actions - its history of aggression, and its drive toward an arsenal of terror (...) (The Iraqi regime) has stockpiled biological and chemical weapons. It is rebuilding the facilities used to make those weapons (...) Iraq is rebuilding facilities at sites that have been part of its nuclear program (...) (Saddam) is seeking nuclear weapons (...) he is moving ever closer to developing a nuclear weapon." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 10/07/2002;

"The battle of Iraq is one victory in a war on terror that began on September the 11, 2001 (...) The liberation of Iraq is a crucial advance in the campaign against terror. We've removed an ally of al Qaeda, and cut off a source of terrorist funding. And this much is certain: No terrorist network will gain weapons of mass destruction from the Iraqi regime, because the regime is no more." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 05/01/2003;

"I am driven with a mission from God. God would tell me, 'George go and fight these terrorists in Afghanistan'. And I did. And then God would tell me 'George, go and end the tyranny in Iraq'. And I did." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, c.a. 07/2005;

"It is a certainty that the al Qaeda network is pursuing such (weapons of mass destruction), and has succeeded in acquiring at least a crude capability to use them. We found evidence of their efforts in the ruins of al Qaeda hideouts in Afghanistan (...) containment is not possible when dictators obtain weapons of mass destruction, and are prepared to share them with terrorists who intend to inflict catastrophic casualties on the United States (...) Deliverable weapons of mass destruction in the hands of a terror network, or a murderous dictator (Saddam Hussein), or the two working together, constitutes as grave a threat as can be imagined." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 08/26/2002;

"(Saddam's) had years to get good at it and we know he has been absolutely devoted to trying to acquire nuclear weapons. And we believe he has, in fact, reconstituted nuclear weapons." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 03/16/2003;

"Terrorist training camps exist on Iraqi soil, and Iraqi officials are known to have had a number of contacts with al-Qaida. These were probably not courtesy calls. Americans have internalized the mantra that Afghanistan represents only the first front in our global war on terror. The next front is apparent, and we should not shrink from acknowledging it. A terrorist resides in Baghdad, with the resources of an entire state at his disposal, flush with cash from illicit oil revenues and proud of a decade-long record of defying the international community's demands that he come clean on his programs to develop weapons of mass destruction." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 02/02/2002;

"Look, we need a regime change in Iraq (...) I think we also ought to prepare the American public in — in — by way of informing them that Saddam Hussein has these weapons, continues to attempt to improve the — their capability and would not be reluctant to export them to other countries. So we need to keep telling the American people that as well, as well as basically — if I may be so blunt — frightening them — frightening and scaring them every day." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 07/16/2002;

"Sept. 11, 2001 showed that al-Qaida is a grave threat. Saddam Hussein has the ability to make a far worse day of infamy by turning Iraq into a weapons assembly line for al-Qaida's network." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 02/14/2003;

"Pray for our military men and women who are striving to do what is right (in Iraq). Also for this country, that our leaders, our national leaders, are sending (troops) out on a task that is from God. That's what we have to make sure that we're praying for, that there is a plan and that that plan is God's plan." - (G.O.P. candidate for Vice-President of the U.S.) Governor Sarah Palin, 09/03/2008;

"(...) there is no doubt that Saddam Hussein operates programs to produce weapons of mass destruction. Experience confirms this. British, Canadian and American intelligence leaves no doubt on the matter. Canada should stand with its allies to remove the Hussein regime. Failure to do so is not fitting with the greatness of our history or with our standing as a nation." - (then opposition leader) S.J. Harper, Jan/03;

"Today, the world is at war. A coalition of countries under the leadership of the U.K. and the U.S. is leading a military intervention to disarm Saddam Hussein. Yet Prime Minister Jean Chretien has left Canada outside this multilateral coalition of nations. This is a serious mistake (...) Modern Canada was forged in large part by war - not because it was easy but because it was right. In the great wars of the last century - against authoritarianism, fascism, and communism - Canada did not merely stand with the Americans, more often than not we led the way. We did so for freedom, for democracy, for civilization itself. These values continue to be embodied in our allies and their leaders, and scorned by the forces of evil, including Saddam Hussein and the perpetrators of the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001." - (then opposition leader and foreign affairs critic) S.J. Harper and S. Day, 03/28/03;

"On the justification for the (Iraq) war, it wasn’t related to finding any particular weapons of mass destruction. In our judgement, it was much more fundamental. It was the removing of a regime that was hostile, that clearly had the intention of constructing weapons systems." - (then opposition leader) S.J. Harper, 08/25//03.
On the "righteousness" of the Afghanistan war, regime change, its progress/success, etc.? (emphasis added)
"In Afghanistan, we saw how terrorists and extremists can use those safe havens, safe havens in a failed state, to bring death and destruction to our people here at home (...) And one of the lessons of that September the 11th day is that we cannot allow terrorists to gain sanctuary anywhere, and we must not allow them to reestablish the safe haven they lost in Afghanistan. Our goal in Afghanistan is to help the people of that country to defeat the terrorists and establish a stable, moderate, and democratic state that respects the rights of its citizens, governs its territory effectively, and is a reliable ally in this war against extremists and terrorists (...) we have made remarkable progress (in Afghanistan)." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 02/15/2007;

"We also began to understand, particularly from the evidence that we uncovered in Afghanistan, that our enemies are determined to acquire weapons of mass destruction -- chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. And we have every reason to believe that if they succeed, they will use them, launching attacks far more deadly than anything we've ever experienced (...) So in addition to going after the terrorists, we are also taking on states that sponsor terror. In Afghanistan, the Taliban regime harbored al-Qaeda and brutalized an entire population. That regime is no more." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 09/17/2003;

"(...) I wanted to come and let you know how impressed we've been with the tremendous progress (made in Afghanistan) (...) By fighting enemies, by standing with our friends, we honor both the ideals and protect the security interests of the United States. The victory of freedom in Afghanistan, as well as in Iraq, will be an inspiration to democratic reformers in other lands." - (G.O.P.) U.S. Vice-President R. ("Dick") B. Cheney, 12/19/2005;

"I believe that we will succeed. We will endure in Afghanistan. We will take out bin Laden, and we will take out the Taliban. And then we've got a major challenge of a stable government (...) But I think the real crunch is going to come after Afghanistan is settled and then we have to address the other countries, including Iraq." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 10/21/2001;

"(...) I think that so far the NATO engagement in Afghanistan has been largely successful (...) I think Afghanistan is dicey. I think that there are certain areas of the country, particularly along the Pakistani border, that are clearly not under the control of either Pakistan or the Afghan government (...) There has been a rise in al Qaeda activity along the border. There has been some increase in U.S. casualties. I am concerned about it, but I'm not as concerned as I am about Iraq today, obviously, or I'd be talking about Afghanistan. But I believe that if Karzai can make the progress that he is making, that - in the long term, we may muddle through in Afghanistan. So I'm guardedly optimistic (...)" - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 11/05/2003;

"So far, it's a remarkable success." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 03/02/2005;

"Afghanistan, we don’t read about anymore, because it’s succeeded. And by the way, there’s several reasons, including NATO participation and other reasons, why Afghanistan is doing as well as it is." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 10/31/2005;

"Very quickly after assuming office, looking at all of Canada's interests abroad, we determined that the single most important thing we're doing in terms of our commitments, in terms of the risks were taking, in terms of the leadership we're showing, the most important thing is what we're doing in Afghanistan." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 03/12/2006;

"You (the soldiers) have put yourselves on the line to defend our national interests; protect Canada and the world from terror (...) it is in our national interest to see Afghanistan become a free, democratic and peaceful country." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 03/13/2006;

"(...) the Government stands firmly behind the vital role being played by our troops in Afghanistan today. The dedicated Canadians in Afghanistan deserve all of our support as they risk their lives to defend our national interests, combat global terrorism and help the Afghan people make a new start as a free, democratic and peaceful country." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 04/04/2006;

"(...) we have made real progress here (in Afghanistan)." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 03/12/2006;

"Progress is being made (in Afghanistan) (...)." - (then) (CPC) Public Safety Minister of Canada S. Day, 04/24/07;

"Canada and Afghanistan have together made significant progress in the last 14 months, progress that was unthinkable only a few years ago." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 05/22/2007;

"I don't have to tell you the story, the link between Afghanistan and the attacks of 9/11, the oppression and brutality endured under the Taliban and the risk that terrorism will come home if we don't confront it here. You also know the progress we have made since the beginning of the mission over five years ago." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 05/23/2007;

"Let's not forget that on 9/11, terrorism came to our shores (from Afghanistan). So we have to be vigilant and very responsible in continuing to play a role in Afghanistan (...) When the Afghanistan government can take care of its own interests, then we can come home (...) Canada's military involvement in Afghanistan has enhanced its international reputation as a defender of freeedom and democracy. It's a volatile world and we have a very important role to play, as we have in previous conflicts." - (CPC) National Defense Minister of Canada P.G. MacKay, 09/10/2007.
And on the economy? (emphasis added)
"The fundamentals of our economy are strong." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 08/21/2007;

"The U.S. economy has some strains but its underpinnings remain strong and resilient." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 11/13/2007;

"I don't think we're headed to recession. But no question, we're in a slowdown." - (G.O.P.) U.S. President G.W. Bush, 02/28/2008;

"I still believe the fundamentals of our economy are strong." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 08/20/2008;

"There has been tremendous turmoil in our financial markets and Wall Street. People are frightened by these events. Our economy I think, still, the fundamentals of our economy are strong, but these are very, very difficult times." - (G.O.P. candidate for President of the U.S.) Senator John McCain, 09/15/2008;

"Canada's economic fundamentals and the oversight of its financial system remain strong." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 04/08/2008;

"Canada's economic fundamentals remain strong." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 07/30/2008;

"The Canadian economy's fundamentals are solid." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 09/15/2008;

"At the moment there are problems in the Canadian economy, but we aren't in a recession." - (CPC) Prime Minister of Canada S.J. Harper, 09/15/2008.
Notice how they also tend to contradict themselves while hanging on desperately to the same talking points as time goes by and as they keep being proven wrong - whether with regards to justifications for going to war, to the Taliban ressurgence in Afghanistan, to the success of the surge in Iraq, to any tangible, significant and sustained progress in Afghanistan and/or Iraq, and even with regards to the economy.

This last week of the McCain-Palin campaign constitutes a paragon of such dynamic - one driven by the 2nd, 4th and 5th Principles of Incompetence. Lying and obfuscating are second nature to them to such degrees, thus ever compelled to distort and exaggerate facts and the truth, that they just can't keep up with reality anymore as events keep on unravelling their lies and fabrications.

Hell, the McCain-Palin has been lying so much about everything and anything (from crowd attendance at rallies or fishes loving oil rigs, to Alaska contributing a whopping 20% to the whole of the U.S. energy needs, via selling state corporate jets on eBay or promising to put the federal checkbook online when this is already implemented), including tap dancing, flip-flopping and side-stepping so as to finding themselves twisted into impossible knots, that this campaign has crossed the threshold of the ridiculous into the great beyond of the absurd.

And this is not counting the outright, shameful lies and fabrications concerning their opponents - including of course accusing them of being guilty for what they have done/are doing (examples here, here, here and here).

Which in turn reminds me of this:
They lie, they misrepresent, they use decoy arguments and make ad hominem attacks. For them, the use of duplicity, of secrecy, of arguments of (non-existent) conspiracy, of fact (and non-fact) selectivity/cherry-picking, of quacks/fake experts, as well as putting forth logical fallacies, are simply means to an end.

And this "end" is the following: to promulgate, support and defend their beliefs or their ideologies.

Truth be told: these are the only things that truly matter to them.
Harper and his Harpies are no exception to this (numerous examples can be found here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here, among many) - not counting their staunch support/defense of Bush/Cheney doctrine, policies and vision, stance on Kyoto and obfuscation/disinformation on global warming, seeking backdoor/underhanded ways to render abortion illegal, stance against same-sex marriage, et al..

In fact, we get the exact same playbook:
A) Blame everything on the previous "liberal" government;
B) Rewrite recent history;
C) Politicize the apparels of Government;
D) Pander to/adopt Christian Right fundamentalist values;
E) Be a warhawk/chickenhawk;
F) Use faux patriotism (and fearmongering).
All things considered, including the utterly disastrous eight years of the Bush-Cheney regime, one would be tempted to conclude that the republicans/conservatives are facing a definite booting out of government in both Canada and the U.S., once these elections are over and done with - right?

Not so fast - sadly enough.

On the one hand, the nation-wide lead of the Democratic Party Obama-Biden ticket over that of the insanely absurd McCain-Palin (or should that be Palin-McCain?) G.O.P. ticket is on average slim, in contrast to what one would expect. Since the McCain-Palin campaign keeps on doing their best to make the elections about character instead of issues (like Bush-Cheney did in 2000 and 2004), banking on the general state of misinformation and/or non-information in the electorate, it looks like indeed too many among the American People are either falling for this same old song and dance, or are being confused by it just enough so far - which may tip the balance in favor of the McCain-Palin ticket in the end. Consequently, we may be facing a situation whereby the Democratic ticket has a slim majority of the total suffrages (say, 51% to 49%) and yet loosing out on the electoral college votes attributed per state (a somewhat facsimile of 2000). Nonetheless, there is hope here that the Obama-Biden may win the day clearly and definitely - although, again, not by the landslide that would be logically expected under the circumstances.

On the other hand, hope is slim in Canada that Harper and his Harpies will lose the elections. Whereas the current McCain-Palin ticket acts like a bad parody of themselves, Harper and the CPC act more like the Bush-Cheney ticket and G.O.P. of 2004. Consequently, these elections are being driven first and foremost (of course) about character, instead of issues. And this is working largely because this is playing on the general state of misinformation and/or non-information in the electorate (as in the U.S.) and because of Harper apparently having no "strong enough" opponent to truly challenge him and his party. Indeed, the LPC and its leader Stéphane Dion have been (and are still) too busy triangulating, seeking to run on their proposed "Green shift carbon tax plan" and making lavish billon dollars promises (see here, here and here, as examples) without any clear plan on how to pay for it all, while missing out on efficiently pushing issues that could sink Harper and the CPC (e.g. women rights/issues, the Afghanistan mission - which Harper is dodging by flip-flopping/backtracking and now giving it an end-date of 2011, the "In-and-Out" scandal, the Bush emulation, et al.), in addition to Dion seemingly behaving like a Dukakis/Kerry hybrid (of the 1988 and 2004 U.S. elections, respectively). Conversely, although the NDP and its leader Jack Layton have apparently learned the lessons of previous elections by challenging Harper only (and not the LPC at the same time), they keep underselling their own electoral platform (which still needs a little bit tilting towards the center) in favor of making no-plan billion dollars promises as well (examples here, here and here) while playing the "character" game above all (although Layton has apparently learned to play the character game this time around - one example here - but it will not be enough to put him over Harper and the CPC). In addition, many ridings lack actual NDP candidates (in mine, I see Jack Layton/NDP signs, but no candidate names). In between, Harper has the field wide open to criticize both Layton and Dion for their big spending promises. This whole situation is further compounded by the media's apparent amnesia (or timid mentionning) of Harper/CPC scandals, gaffes and woes (examples here, here and here; and see another list here) - again, in a similar situation as that of the 2004 elections in the U.S. and in sharp contrast to the current 2008 U.S. elections.

Taking these considerations altogether, we get the following result: a recent Canwest News Service/Global National poll indicates that Canadians' pick as would-be best Prime Minister stand at 49.9% for Harper, 30.5% for Jack Layton, and 19.6% for Stéphane Dion. Granted, such polls are inherently biased towards incumbent Prime Ministers; nevertheless, a recent Canadian Press/Harris-Decima poll indicates the voting intentions of Canadians as follows: 36% for the CPC, 27% for the LPC, and 16% for the NDP. Hence, it looks like we are heading right back were we started in 2006, ending up with a Harper minority government again (at best) - which will mean at least two more years (if not four) of Harper governing as if he heads a majority government, being enabled to do so as in the last two years by the two other opposition parties which will be again too busy with their re-evaluations and triangulations (if not having to choose a new leader yet again, in the case of the LPC).

Although it is a given that I will not vote for Harper and the CPC, I find myself being frustrated by the fact that I just can't decide yet on whether to vote LPC or NDP - in large part due to overall unfocused campaigning on their part.

Need I say that I am not happy at all by the way things are apparently playing themselves out - in both the U.S. and, especially, in Canada?


(Cross-posted from APOV)

Tuesday

submitting isn't peace

wow- what a week! and it's only tuesday. guess it still feels like last week when the world's economy is up in the air. and the farce- i mean election- here in america still drones on. apparently, and i missed this, there was a debate between candidates last friday. at least i think it was last friday- who even knows? i mean really, why would you hold a debate in the middle of an economic crisis? oh right... :) so, my posts lately at my blog have been a bit doom and gloomish and here too- and really not much has changed that outlook. actually, it's a bit disheartening when the research i started almost 3 years ago- turned out to be right on. it's scary. but, onwards and upwards...

so, i started thinking about peace- as i do every monday night preparing for posting here at the peace tree- and i read through the google reader for inspiration. yep. sigh. not much good news out there. i read lots of blogs and there are a few that pique my interests- lately the focus for me has been about right versus left. i am having a really hard time with people who are right of center. really hard. i cannot fathom how much the rightwing hates the left, but apparently, it's enough to get them to vote against their own best interests rather than vote away from the iceberg. and i began to realize that i will most likely never reach anything close to enlightenment in this lifetime.

because i won't forgive the rightwing and the bevy of corporates and the christian zealots for destroying this planet and this country.

one blog i read questioned whether right versus left was counterproductive. of course it is. any conflict that resorts to violence is counterproductive. and believe me- some folks on the right would love to open hunting season on anyone from the left. anytime you put opposites in a competition, it gets ugly. which is why the tragedy in iraq is so.... well, there aren't words for ethnic cleansing. the tragedy is compounded by the greed and lies that started it and is now ruining millions of lives here and there- as well as helping to kill the planet.

and still people vote republican. i cannot wrap my head around it.

we have to stand against the coming fascism. voting isn't enough anymore. the deck is stacked and the good guys don't win. we must pass on the seeds of activism and freedom so that it doesn't die with us. it is probably the very least that we can do.

"Peace is not the absence of conflict; it's a way through it. Because we humans are always going to be in conflict in some form or another, making peace means actively addressing conflict and injustice – not running away from it — using nonviolent methods."

Monday

Creature Comforts X two

Creature Comforts - BBC Comic Relief 2007

Politicians debate the war in Iraq

Sunday

Trying To Have Hope

The topic below was orginally posted on my blog, the Intrepid Liberal Journal.

I want to have hope for my country. And I'm doing my best to help elect the most viable progressive candidate president by volunteering for the Obama campaign. While I'm fully aware of his flaws I regard Obama as intelligent and believe his decision making process on high stakes issues will mostly be judicious and thoughtful. Hell, compared to John McCain, Barack Obama is Plato.

Nevertheless, when contemplating the socio-economic and geopolitical place we find ourselves in it's hard to feel anything but despair. We're engaged in two failed military occupations in Afghanistan and Iraq. Afghanistan is imploding and al quaeda is rebuilding. As for Iraq, with all due respect to the "surge," a military occupation that requires billions of America's treasure as well our blood, not to mention the blood of Iraqis that have been shed to maintain a semblance of stability is not a success.

And now we're forced to spend trillions to bail out Wall Street thanks to the medacity of the Bush Administration and their cabal of chuckle heads, cronies and plutocrats. Much of this is of course being financed by creditors overseas.



I mean, what the hell will a new president be able to do upon taking office? How can can any president deliver on campaign promises of tax cuts or spending programs for infrastructure, education and health care when you combine the cost of two military occupations with the bail out of Wall Street? I know Obama wants to get out of Iraq but ending that occupation in a prudent manner can't be done quickly. We're going to spend billions more money in Iraq even if Obama wins. Also, there is the moral requirements to help finance Iraq's reconstruction considering we invaded their country without legitimate provocation, tortured their citizens at Abu Ghraib and killed a whole lot of their people to make money for Halliburton, Bechtel and Blackwater USA.

And we can't just pull out of Afghanistan. After financing our proxy war in Afghanistan against the Soviet Union in the 80s we turned our back on those people. And we know the tragic legacy of that mistake. Yet our presence isn't helping and a "surge" in Afghanistan will not bring any more political reconciliation to that country than it has in Iraq. If anything the internal dynamics of Afghanistan and their culture of war lords is even more cumbersome. Yet many Democrats, including Obama have talked about increasing our troop levels in Afghanistan. And that will cost billions too.

At least when FDR became president it was merely a matter of political will to implement the New Deal and establish institutions that helped build an enduring middle class for the twentieth century. Also, when FDR became president America wasn't consumed by two military occupations as the next president will be . Hence, when the gathering storm clouds of the Axis Powers engulfed the world in war, FDR was able to mobilize America's industrial prowess for the effort. Suppose the liquidity crisis on Wall Street today empowers another Hitler overseas who exploits global economic depression and seizes power? What then if America is overextended with our occupations in Iraq and Afghanistan?

Political will by itself won't be enough for the next president. Global liquidity is in rapidly short supply and the world is running out of oil. Global warming is a ticking time bomb and many regions in the world, including the American southwest our contending with a water shortage crisis. Addressing these challenges requires capital and lots of it. Capital that we don't have. Hence, somehow the next president is going to have to pull a rabbit out of their hat and create a new twenty-first century socio-economic paradigm on the cheap. And he'll have to do it fast.

I believe Obama at least grasps the challenges ahead. Sadly, John McCain appears to be out of his depth with a limited grasp of the modern world.

Continued: Social Justice Quiz 2008

Authored by Bill Quigley, a human rights lawyer and law professor at Loyola University New Orleans. Questions #1-7 are found on The Peace Tree, Sunday, September 14.
Click below for the answers to (and documentation of) today's segment of the quiz.



8. How many people in the world do not have electricity?

9. People in the US consume 42 kilograms of meat per person per year.
How much meat and grain do people in India and China eat?

10. How many cars does China have for every 1000 drivers? India? The U.S.?

11. How much grain is needed to fill a SUV tank with ethanol?

12. According to the Wall Street Journal, the richest 1% of Americans earns what percent of the nation's adjusted gross income?
A) 5%, B) 10%, C) 15%, D)20%


Expand the post +/-


8. World-wide, 1.6 billion people do not have electricity. 2.5 billion people use wood, charcoal or animal dung for cooking.
United Nations Human Development Report 2007/2008, pages 44-45.

9. People in the US lead the world in meat consumption at 42 kg per person per year compared to 1.6 kg in India and 5.9 kg in China.
People in the US consume five times the grain (wheat, rice, rye, barley, etc.) as people in India, three times as much as people in China, and twice as much as people in Europe.
"THE BLAME GAME: Who is behind the world food price crisis," Oakland Institute, July 2008.

10. China has 9 cars for every 1000 drivers. India has 11 cars for every 1000 drivers. The US has 1114 cars for every 1000 drivers.
Iain Carson and Vijay V. Vaitheeswaran, Zoom: The Global Race to Fuel the Car of the Future (2007).

11. The grain needed to fill up a SUV tank with ethanol could feed a hungry person for a year. Lester Brown, CNN.Money.com, August 16, 2006

12. D: "According to the figures, the richest 1% reported 22% of the nation's total adjusted gross income in 2006. That is up from 21.2% a year earlier, and is the highest in the 19 years that the IRS has kept strictly comparable figures. The 1988 level was 15.2%. Earlier IRS data show the last year the share of income belonging to the top 1% was at such a high level as it was in 2006 was in 1929, but changes in measuring income make a precise comparison difficult."
Jesse Drucker, "Richest Americans See Their Income Share Grow," Wall Street Journal,
July 23, 2008, page A3.


Cross Posted on Border Explorer.
Concluding segment of Social Justice Quiz 2008 next Sunday morning.

Saturday

Saturday Sonata XIV: Broken Place

LT here, with Saturday Sonata XIV.

Today a little music from that other guy from New Jersey, John Gorka. I love the intro on his Web site:

Whatever brought you here I thank you for stopping by. I check into the site every now and then but most of my time and energy goes into making music in the non-virtual world. That means a lot of traveling, coming up with new songs, recalling or learning old songs and making new recordings. I hope that you will find something here that’s worth your time and I hope to provide more fresh content than I’ve managed in the past.

All the best,
John Gork


One of the real ones. Here's "Broken Place," a sad, slow, quiet, depressing, warm song:

Expand the post +/-






From that beautiful broken place, that well of endless sorrow
Forever and a day, sing like there’s no tomorrow

That beautiful broken place that gave you a curtained freedom
Your bane and your saving grace, you showed them you did not need them

That beautiful broken place, sweet curse of disenchantment
Spanish without a trace, accent on hope abandoned

That beautiful broken place you could not outshine the twilight
Your demons were not outpaced, they still scratch away at the good nights

That beautiful broken place, the fuel to the early fires
Burned down a whole damn place, no greater than your desires

…That well of endless sorrow
Forever and a day, sing like there’s no tomorrow
Sing like there’s no tomorrow
Sing like there’s no tomorrow
Sing like there’s no…no beautiful broken place


John does Woody Guthrie:



John talks about making songs, and plays one:



These are the lyrics to John Gorka's "Stranger With Your Hair":

I saw a stranger with your hair
Tried to make her give it back
So I could send it off to you
Maybe Federal Express
'Cause I know you'd miss it
I saw another with your eyes

The flash just turned my head
I went to try them on for size
But they looked the other way
And they wouldn't listen

Chorus: But you're never hard to find in a crowd
The people around you smiling out loud
Their feet don't touch the ground
No, their feet don't touch the ground
No, their feet don't touch the ground

I heard a stranger with your voice
It took me by surprise
Again I found it wasn't you
Just an angel in disguise
In for a visit

By the way how is my heart
I haven't seen it since you left
I'm almost sure it followed you
Could you sometime send it back
I'll buy the ticket

(Chorus)
I saw a stranger with your hair
I saw another with your eyes
I heard an angel with your voice
By the way how is my heart
By the way how is my heart


The following is not John Gorka. I don't even know who these people are. I put them here only because they're singing the song lyric'd above. It's the only version I could find. And though the person handling camera duties found it too pressing, apparently, to turn the camera on before the song began, it is nevertheless a wonderful version of the song. And they're singing in church - so you know they're being very sincere. Please enjoy it, and have a wonderfully depressing day here in this broken place.

A Conversation I had on the blog "Pirates, Man Your Women"

The post was titled, How Democrats treat the American Flag, detailing the now debunked story of the abuse of all those flags at the DNC. The post was by a blogger named Tina. I will not be leaving any of the post here. I found the post to be tasteless and in many respects, pointless. Tina, the author, blasted democrats for being unpatriotic, among other things. Mostly typical trolling talking points. This is the first comment I made after I read her post and the rest followed...

TPM: So waving a flag and wearing a flag lapel pin, essentially wearing your love of country on your sleeve, is your idea of respect?
There are many ways to express your love of country without resorting to the overuse or over abundance of its “symbols”. Wave the flag all day if it suits you, just don’t assume that such a gesture is a sign of someone's love of country.
Each and every democrat I know has respect for the flag. It is the over abundance of flags and the insistence that one have or wave one that should be seen as a degradation to the principles of country. It’s like the guy that can bench 300 pounds and has to wear a t-shirt to tell everybody about it… or the proud a parent of an honor-roll student who feels compelled to let everyone know by attaching a bumper sticker to their car!
Peace…

KATIE: I don’t think that dumping the flag in the bin, after the photo op, is showing respect or patriotism. I’m surprised that they wouldn’t have brought them home as a souvenir, something to proudly have in their home.
I think that the hypocrisy happens when people grab up the flag for the photo ops, but dump them in the bin after the cameras are gone.)

CHAD: Wow, good try redirecting the point.
Waving the flag and wearing a lapel pin mean nothing to me for patriotism.
But when you do get a flag and dump it on the floor/in the trash when it doesn’t suit your immediate purpose anymore is an indicator of your feelings.
And I can see if you live in a blue collar town and all you know are Democrats, then yeah, they’d respect the flag. But those elite college educated Dems… no, there something else. They don’t respect the flag or this country. I know them, I’ve talked to them. The US is an outmoded idea, no longer relevant. Socialism is the future, one world government managing everyone’s energy usage, restricting power to only those in power.
How many times have you been walking down the street and been accosted out of the blue by a conservative yelling at you for not waving a flag? Doesn’t happen. Most liberals have never even talked to conservatives about conservative values. Or else they’d be surprised that the conservatives don’t care about things like Sarah Palin in a bikini.)

Read More +/-


TINA: hey “poetryman” you sound like you are one of the elitest who condemn this country..
Pride in this country has been walked over by people like you!
Displaying your pride in this country is something that is important, and sadly lacking in the country. When it comes to presidential elections pride in our country and its symbols is very appropriate.. just as it is on Independence day, Memorial Day, Labor Day.. and is wonderful if shared & displayed the rest of the year. When i saw pix of the DNC i was amazed by the lack of patriotism… this is the time when displaying patriotism is exciting! But when organizers of the DNC do not even bother to adore the location with any form of pride for the USA that is sad.. instead there were forms of pride for an individual man.. that is sad & egotistical.. but that hasbeen the foundation of his campaign!
When it comes to people of the heartland, the farms/workers of this nation.. they are the 1st ones who will show pride in our country, even when times are tough.. they still show pride.. and they will gladly display their patriotism any way they can.
The ONLY people I ever see who spit on the flag & this country are the brain-washed-liberals who think they are better than everyone else.. who believe in socialist concepts that Obama obviously supports.
Trashing the flag.. that was the BIG issue, aside from the lack of patriotism displayed at the DNC.. the flags those who attended were given.. were simply tossed in the trash.. that is sad, that is disguting.. and underlines what I am saying.. those no doubt were the self-riteous socialist democrats..
PS.. to emphasize a point…
McCain’s supporters were shouting “USA,USA”… as they proudly waved American Flags.
Obama supporters shouted “Obama, Obama”.. as they drooled over that individual..
That shows so much.. McCain supporters are supporting AMERICA.. you know the country we LIVE IN!
Obama supporters do not care about this country and are in a love-drool fest with an individual who has no policies or plans.. exccept to destroy this country and everything we believe in! A vote for that egotistical loser is a vote for a socialist country with a topping of chaos! There are already countries with that.. grab Obama and go there if you believe in him, ok?)

TPM: I see some of you responded to me, yet appear to have no idea what it is that I was saying. I will try it again.

**Just because my wife and I wear wedding rings doesn't mean our marriage is sound.

Just because hundreds of flags are being waved and people are chanting USA doesn't mean that our country is in good shape.**

By the way... the “flags in the dumpster” story seems to have been a GOP/RNC lowly tactic to give the perception of grave misuse of the symbol (flag). Too bad, too, because you had your moment there and now it seems that it really never happened. Funny how such maneuvers can cause such unneeded flack, eh?

You probably don't believe that the GOP or RNC or McCain camp would do such a thing and that, in and of itself, is degradation to country.

Another example**, if one needs it to understand what I tried to convey the first time---

Before, however, I would like to give the commenter, Tina, something to chew on-

Tina, with all due respect… I'm smack dab in the middle of farm country! I'm surrounded by farmers and cowboys, etc! I was raised on a farm! (My brain, however, was lucky enough to have never been fertilized by your version of how you imagine all country people, farmers, etc think. You know what assuming can do for a point in your argument? Sure you do.) Furthermore, I know plenty of farmers and "country folk" who think Bush is the worst president this country has seen and they could give a rat’s ass about displaying a symbol or chanting USA just to indicate their love of country! They'd rather be able to feed, house, educate, and clothe their children than worry if some Josie friggin’ blow thinks they've enough love for their country! It’s preposterous to assume that they are empty and vacuous and only care for patriotic symbols! They'd rather consider the facts and the state of the nation than wave some goddamned flag around imagining that it was or is a sure fired way of showing love of country! They’d say respect The U.S. Constitution over any idiotic, manufactured in China symbol! What, Tina, don't believe there are any “country folk” out there that think like that? Who you going to believe a country boy from Arkansas or your assuming ears and eyes?

Now on to the example-

**When seeing a doctor for something and you're in the waiting room and see the degree plaque(s) hanging on the wall letting everyone know that the doctor is licensed, etc...they can be a form of comfort for patients, right? I mean surely there is no other reason for them hanging around, other than code, if not for that, right?

Well, just because he or she has plaques on the wall from a prestigious medical school doesn't make him or her the best doctor for you or your family, right? I mean they could still be a quack. They could still botch the operation. They could be a pervert or a sloppy surgeon, etc. Right? So the degree hanging on the wall indicating that the doctor has the credentials to see you for your ailments doesn't really guarantee you anything, right?

Just because someone waves a flag or chants USA like they love their country does not necessarily make it so and it certainly doesn't mean that they have good intentions for their country and it doesn't mean that those that do not display a flag are any less inclined to love their country. It does, given the inclination to think that it does prove something, makes fools out of a good many voters.**

Peace...


CHAD: But when you do get a flag and dump it on the floor/in the trash when it doesn’t suit your immediate purpose anymore is an indicator of your feelings.

TPM: Chad,
What a load...

We live in the most consumptive nation on the planet... We also live in one of the most ignorant. I love the world I was born on. And yes, I love the country I was lucky enough to have been born in, but when the flag most of them were waving, the smaller, made for consumption, manufactured in China type, "seemed" to have been dumped by the wayside in plain view (gasp!) instead of waiting until they got home to toss them or stack them in the closet to collect dust or what have you, I call your assumption the height of hypocrisy. The flags, by the way, were mostly found to be a number of unused and still in bags and untouched by the DNC crowd. You've been lied to about the overwhelming misuse of the flag at the DNC. I cannot recall which station I saw the story on (certainly not FOX), it was also in a number of papers, but they debunked the entire mess and put it toward a campaign tactic to shore up the flag loving, USA chanting sycophants that hadn't decided who they were going to vote for yet! It's laughable, at best, to assume that "Democrats" (I'm an Independent, by the way), who have served their country in record numbers, are abusing the flag any more than anyone else. Hell! I'd rather abuse the flag; burn it, soil it, etc, than abuse the flag in the fashion that the Republicans have been doing for almost eight years! They aren't just abusing a symbol; they're abusing the very thread of this nation’s laws and her respect throughout the globe. Torture, illegal wire tapping, the 9-11 mantra, Justice department lies, worst foreign policy blunder(s) in history, the disrespect of our soldiers coming home to Walter Reid and others and returning to cut benefits, etc, and let's not forget the infamous "Mission Accomplished" banner had a big old “flag” hanging from that god-awful deceit!

I guess the US Constitution, the troops, and the rule of law just don't quite suit their immediate purpose, eh, Chad?

__________________________________________________________________

That is how it stands at this juncture. Not sure if I'll venture that way again.

(I am not leaving a link to "Pirates, Man Your Women"...) No point, really.

LinkWithin

Related Posts with Thumbnails